The difference between the two is the amount of CUDA cores used by the cards, memory speed and the amount of memory. If you're in the market for a $150 1080p-gaming GPU the 750 Ti should be at the top of your list.The Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti is one of Nvidia’s two new low-cost graphics cards, the other being the GeForce GTX 750. Nvidia's 750 Ti also uses 55W less than the 115W R7 260X, making it nearly twice as power efficient than its AMD counterpart. It consumes less power and outperforms both the R7 260X and HD 7790 by an average of 11% in both gaming and synthetic benchmarks. Nvidia's really taken it to AMD with the 750 Ti. This is by no means a deal breaker, but getting to pick between Thief (coming out February 25th), Deus Ex: Human Revolution, Hitman Absolution, Dirt 3, and Sleeping Dogs is something to consider, especially if that lack of SLI support is bumming you out. The 750 Ti doesn't support SLI, so if you want a budget card that will let you add a second GPU down the line, I'd recommend a trip to AMD country for R7 260X.Īlso, the R7 260X currently comes bundled with two games, and the 750 Ti does not, at least as of this writing. There's not much to moan about with the 750 Ti, however, if you're looking for a $150 video card that supports dual-GPU capabilities, keep looking. That's a wise design choice with the Steam Box revolution right around corner. I also appreciate the sleek 5.7" single-slot design, which makes this card great for living room friendly small-form-factor PCs. I'm really impressed by its miniscule power consumption, no additional power connectors required. Every game I used for benchmarking, except the punishing Metro: Last Light, naturally, ran at a silky smooth 50-60 FPS. I saw the card effortlessly handle games at 1080p with high settings. Settings used: API: DirectX 11, Quality: Ultra, Tessellation: Extreme, AA X4Īt $150 the 750 Ti offers impressive bang for buck performance. DX11 Enhanced, PhysX DisabledĭirectX 11 tessellation performance: Frames per second: higher is better 3DMark Fire Strike (normal) Settings used: MSAA 4X, Geometry DX11 Enhanced, Dynamic Shadows DX11 Enhanced, D.O.F. Settings used: SSAA Enabled, PhysX Disabled Our test bed consisted of an Intel Core i7-2700K at stock speeds on a Gigabyte Z68X-UD7-B3 board with 8GB of DDR3/1600 RAM, a 128GB SanDisk Extreme II SSD drive, and a 750W Cooler Master power supply.ĭirectX 11 gaming performance: Frames per second: higher is better Sleeping Dogs: BenchmarksĪll benchmarks were run on the high settings at 1920x1080, (except when otherwise noted) with 4X FXAA enabled. Nvidia's 650 Ti card also features a two-slot design, so the 750 Ti is a slimmer, faster, and more powerful GPU overall. The 750 Ti's performance is impressive, as the 650 Ti almost consumes twice the amount of power with its 110W TDP. When averaging all the benchmarks together, Nvidia's 750 Ti is 22% faster than the 600 series card. I also tested the 750 Ti against last year's GTX 650 Ti. The 750 Ti won every benchmark against the AMD cards, making it the clear winner in terms of raw performance. Both AMD cards sell for $120-$130, so they're less expensive than the 750 Ti, but not by much. To benchmark the 750 Ti's performance I d it off against AMD's R7 260X and a Sapphire HD 7790 OC. Noise was no problem when I overclocked the card, and it wasn't noticeably louder than when it was stock clocked. I overclocked the 750 Ti by modestly increasing its boost clock to 1169MHz, using EVGA's Precision X overclocking tool.ĭoing so created no detectable stability issues, and provided a performance increase of about 5% across all games, with the exception of Batman: Arkham Origins which only received a 3% boost in performance. If you're going to run multiple monitors I'd push you toward this 2GB Ti version, as you'll have more video RAM bandwidth for doing things across your displays. It's worth mentioning a non-Ti version will come soon and sport 1GB of RAM and retail for $119/£90. The 750 Ti comes with 2GB of GDDR5 video RAM clocked at 5400MHz, too. The card features 512 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1020MHz, and a boost clock of 1085MHz. When it comes to specs this entry-level 700-Series card doesn't disappoint. That, combined with its small size, makes it an easy upgrade for a wide swath of systems. Nvidia's PSU requirement for the 750 Ti is also low at just 300W, so you won't need a beefy 500W or 750W beast to power this mini GPU. In contrast, AMD's R7 260X eats up almost double the wattage with its 115W TDP. The 750 Ti is a power-efficient video card that consumes a mere 60W.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |